Web Development Link Building Copywriting Testimonials

PR in the blogosphere

April 21st, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Public relations in the blogosphere seems to operate under a new set of rules than traditional PR. With traditional PR you hire a PR firm that has relationships with various journalists and media. With the new PR, you start your own blog (assuming of course you have something worthwhile to say) and you work to become one of the blogging elite. The goal is to get the more influential bloggers to notice you and blog about you. You wouldn’t just leave this to chance; you’d help the process along. If, for example, you want to catch Scoble’s eye, then you would say something interesting that somehow relates to Scoble and work in a mention of his name. Scoble, like many other bloggers, follows what’s being said about him in the blogosphere by subscribing to a PubSub search results feed for the word “scoble.” If Scoble likes your post, you could end up with a mention on Scoble’s link blog or, better still, on the Scobleizer blog.

Imagine telling a PR person 10 years ago that, in the future, the way to catch the eye of various journalists is to become a journalist yourself and then write about THEM, that PR person would think you were off your rocker. My, how times have changed!

As an up-and-coming blogger, you might be tempted to brown-nose the A-List bloggers. Don’t kiss up to them, but don’t denigrate them either. This isn’t necessarily a hard-and-fast rule, just a suggested guideline. Some bloggers are quite open to being taken to task. They even encourage it.

There is a line of course that shouldn’t be crossed. Always act in good taste. Scoble himself described, during our MarketingProfs Thought Leaders Summit last month on business blogging, how it really isn’t a “line,” it is more like a “membrane.” There is give-and-take, and flexibility with what’s ok to say in your blog and what’s not, particularly as you build rapport with different bloggers in the blogosphere and you build up your reputation. But don’t push too hard or too often, or that “membrane” may rupture!

Now I wonder if Scoble will blog about this post…

Spread the word: delicious this:PR in the blogosphere digg this:PR in the blogosphere spurl this:PR in the blogosphere furl this:PR in the blogosphere reddit this:PR in the blogosphere Add to Y!:PR in the blogosphere

Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo’s Creative Commons Search

April 7th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

Yahoo Creative Commons Search home page screenshotYahoo’s just released a very cool new search engine called Yahoo! Creative Commons Search. With it you can search all the Creative Commons licenced content on the web. For those not familiar with Creative Commons, I’ve blogged about it before. In summary, it is an alternative to copyright, where some rights are reserved by the author, but not all. It’s as quick and painless as can be for the author: you simply fill out this form that specifies how you want your material used out in the marketplace and the license is generated to place on your site. For example, your license can require attribution, restrict to only noncommercial use, allow for the creation of derivative works, etc.

There is a wealth of content out there under a liberal Creative Commons licence that will allow you to reuse and repurpose that content in your own projects. But finding that content used to be hard work. (Actually there was previously another way to search, but it wasn’t as comprehensive, and it wasn’t from a major search engine). Now it’s just a search query away, thanks to Yahoo!

I can hear you asking yourself: “That’s all fine and good, but what use will I have with it?” Here are a few ideas to get your creative juices flowing:

  1. Collect interesting articles on a particular topic from different authors, write your own overview/summary to go with it, then assemble it all into an ebook and offer it on your site as a free download.
  2. Take information relating to a particular company that you would like to land as a customer and arrange it into a scrapbook, then post it on your blog and ask readers to contribute to it further. Hopefully the prospective customer will take notice of your initiative and of your interest in them. If not, bring it to their attention. (What a great, new spin on the standard “cold call”!)
  3. Augment your articles, white papers, etc. with excerpted content relevant to the topic you’re covering. For example, if you wrote a white paper about “How Google Works,” add Creative Commons-licensed photos and text descriptions describing their data centers.
  4. Identify keywords that you want to rank well for and create a mini library of Creative Commons-licensed content about that keyword.

These are just a few ideas, and of course you have to abide by the terms of each content-owner’s license. Idea #4, for example, would be considered commercial use if that library of pages were serving as landing pages to get searchers who find you to buy something. IMPORTANT: Don’t just assume that because it showed up in the search results, it’s licensed under Creative Commons. Some plain ol’ copyrighted material will have undoubtedly snuck into the index. No search engine is 100% perfect. I didn’t have time to test it out much myself, but it seems to pass muster with Tara at ResearchBuzz, so it must be pretty good!

An insightful reader on Slashdot commented that it would be brilliant if Yahoo! took the next step and launched a Bittorrent tracker that was limited to Creative Commons licensed content, with a centralized directory-style index. Bittorrent, if you aren’t familiar with it, offers super-fast de-centralized file sharing on a file-by-file basis. It can be used to download legitimate files, like a trial version of a software program or music under a Creative Commons license. To get started, you need to have the Bittorrent software installed on your computer, and you’ll need to have somehow obtained a Torrent file for a particular big file that you want. This Torrent file is tiny, and it contains information about how to connect with others who have parts of the file you want. But where do you find these Torrent files? That’s where a tracker comes in. More on Bittorent later, in a separate post.

With that, I’ll let you get on with using this new Yahoo! engine to “embrace and extend” to your heart’s content.

Oh, by the way… If you want to learn more the fascinating story of copyright law (no, I’m not kidding! The way Larry Lessig tells it, it really IS interesting!), check out Larry Lessig’s speech at OSCON, with audio syncronized with his Powerpoint slides. Larry is the brains behind the Creative Commons and an overall brilliant lawyer/author/blogger/Stanford professor.

Spread the word: delicious this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search digg this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search spurl this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search furl this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search reddit this:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search Add to Y!:Embrace and extend, courtesy of Yahoo's Creative Commons Search

New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click

March 10th, 2005

by Stephan Spencer

aggregate mapI found the eyetracking study from Enquiro and Did-It unveiled last week at Search Engine Strategies and covered in Search Day fascinating. The aggregate heat map shown on the right (larger version here) shows where participants focused their eyes (and their attention) the most. As you can see, the first listing not only drew the most attention; the full listing was read more fully from left to right, than other listings.

Visibility drops the further down the search results you go, and clickthroughs drop even more markedly (as you can see from the graphs below). This got me thinking about Zipf’s Law. Zipf’s Law is applicable to Top Ten Lists, as Seth Godin explains, perhaps Zipf’s Law might be applicable to the SERPs (search engine results pages) too? (In general terms, Zipf’s Law states that being #1 is much, much better than being #2 which is much, much better than being #3 and so on. So dominating a Top 10 list is critical.) Although these graphs don’t follow Zipf’s Law exactly, nonetheless given this data I’d consider it foolish to be complacent if your search listings are not at the very top of the SERPs.

What is it about searchers that makes them so blind to relevant results further down the page? Is this due to the “implied endorsement” effect, where searchers tend to simply trust Google to point them to the right thing? Or is it just the way humans are wired, to make snap decisions, as Malcolm Gladwell insightfully explains in his new book, Blink? According to the study, 72% of searchers click on the first link of interest, whereas 25.5% read all listings first, then decide. My guess is that both effects (”implied endorsement” and “rapid cognition”) play a role in searcher behavior.

A few other important take-aways from the study:

  1. 6/7 (85%) of searchers click on natural (”organic”) results (not 60/40 as the search engines and PPC (pay-per-click) vendors would have you believe).
  2. The top 4 sponsored slots are equivalent in views to being ranked at #7 - #10 natural.
  3. (corollary to #2): This means if you need to make a business case for natural search, then (assuming you can attain at least #3 rank in natural for the same keywords you bid on) natural search could be worth two to three times your PPC results.

In all, a superb research study. Great job Did-It, Enquiro, and EyeTools!

line graph of visibility
line graph of clickthroughs

Spread the word: delicious this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click digg this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click spurl this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click furl this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click reddit this:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click Add to Y!:New eyetracking study: where Google searchers look and click

Link Popularity Checker

March 4th, 2005

Use this handy tool to check for inbound links to your site that the major search engines know about.

Enter a web site URL (for example “www.netconcepts.com”):
(Note: www.netconcepts.com and netconcepts.com returns different results!)

Spread the word: delicious this:Link Popularity Checker digg this:Link Popularity Checker spurl this:Link Popularity Checker furl this:Link Popularity Checker reddit this:Link Popularity Checker Add to Y!:Link Popularity Checker

AntiqueHardware.com

March 2nd, 2005

AntiqueHardware.com screenshotThis ecommerce site offers a range of items from cabinet hardware to telephone booths and from rubber duckies to magnificent clawfoot bathtubs. AntiqueHardware.com offers original restored antiques as well as flawless replica pieces perfect for any home or office. Visitors are greeted with their own account pages and an easily navigated shopping cart experience.

[ database | client admin cms | SEO ]

Visit The Site: Antique Hardware

Audience Development and the Internet

Circulation and the Internet: Co-hosted by American Business Media and National Trade Circulation Foundation, Inc. — New York City

February 8th, 2005

Panelist: Brian Klais

  1. The benefit of the internet to your circulation/audience development efforts, and how important it is to your company
  2. How to use email to renew or acquire new subscribers
  3. E-mail tests - what’s working, what’s not working
  4. Search engine marketing - what are you using and how is it working
  5. Banner ads - are they working, what have you changed, where do you have them
  6. How has can spam effected your subscription efforts? How has it effected your list rental activities? How has it effected your use of outside lists for subscription promotion?
  7. Web agents - are they still working?
  8. Blogs - are they a source of names? How can we get subscription information onto a blog?
  9. Email files - do you have separate files for circulation, web casts, eNL, or a combined database for all? Advantages and disadvantages for each.

Gloria Adams, Pennwell - Moderator
Laura Wilson, NEJM - Panelist
Sean Fulton, GCN Publishing - Panelist
Brian Klais, Netconcepts - Panelist

Spread the word: delicious this:Audience  Development and the Internet digg this:Audience  Development and the Internet spurl this:Audience  Development and the Internet furl this:Audience  Development and the Internet reddit this:Audience  Development and the Internet Add to Y!:Audience  Development and the Internet

Marketing Association

February 1st, 2005

The Marketing Association New Zealand screenshotThe Marketing Association, formerly the New Zealand DMA, is an industry body serving New Zealand marketers with professional development, networking, advocacy, government lobbying, and more.

Being on the leading edge of marketing in New Zealand, the organisation needed a website that conveyed that they understood the evolving model of the Web from passive publishing to participatory conversations. So the site was redesigned to have a very bloggy feel to it. Functionality includes a banner ad management system, content management system, and a members-only area.

[ database | client admin cms | SEO ]

Visit The Site: Marketing Association NZ

Partnered with Netconcepts for SEO success

“I recommend Netconcepts to any web marketer who cannot prioritize resources to search engine optimize internally. Over our 6 years in partnership, they have never steered us wrong!”

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Partnered with Netconcepts for SEO success digg this:Partnered with Netconcepts for SEO success spurl this:Partnered with Netconcepts for SEO success furl this:Partnered with Netconcepts for SEO success reddit this:Partnered with Netconcepts for SEO success Add to Y!:Partnered with Netconcepts for SEO success

Be careful who you link to

December 14th, 2004

by Dave Cooper

There is an interesting and amusing thread over at SEW. A punter asks, on the surface, an innocent question as to why his mate’s site has dropped out of Google.

A bunch of the regulars offer some suggestions for possible problems, and then on the second page, GoogleGuy appears and really wades in, revealing the site is linking to some very bad evil affiliate spammers.

Interesting that GoogleGuy would take the time to do some research on the site. Interesting that SEW allow such specifics to be discussed. Interesting that a good number of other SEO’s didn’t catch the real problem. And amusing that the punter gets his butt kicked from very high up in such a public manner. At least he had the good grace to admit he’s been a bad boy.

The lesson here people, is to be careful who you link to and who they link to in turn. Reciprocal linking is bad, you don’t know who else they have requested a link from. And do you have the time and skills to research those link properly. It took GoogleGuy to find the real problem and a bunch of professional SEO’s missed it.

Spread the word: delicious this:Be careful who you link to digg this:Be careful who you link to spurl this:Be careful who you link to furl this:Be careful who you link to reddit this:Be careful who you link to Add to Y!:Be careful who you link to

Information As Power

December 10th, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Originally published in Web ReDesign 2.0: Workflow That Works

Most companies don’t even realize their competitors are “eating their lunch” online - ranking higher in the search engines, getting more traffic, converting more visitors into buyers and enjoying better returns on their website investment. They simply don’t know how well their website is performing. And they are missing out on valuable e-business opportunities.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:Information As Power digg this:Information As Power spurl this:Information As Power furl this:Information As Power reddit this:Information As Power Add to Y!:Information As Power

Pages (18): « First ... « 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 » ... Last »


Related tags

and/or

Newsletter

Web marketing virtuoso Stephan Spencer, shares a wealth of emarketing experience and hard-hitting, practical advice in our monthly newsletter. It's full of valuable insights...You should subscribe.








Latest posts
Latest comments


Contact Us

HEADQUARTERS
2820 Walton Commons West, Suite 123
Madison, WI 53718 USA
Phone: (608) 285-6600
Toll-free: 888 207-1109

REGIONAL OFFICE
36 Anzac Rd., Browns Bay
Auckland, New Zealand
Phone: (+64) 9 476-4601
infodesk@netconcepts.com